8,864
回編集
編集の要約なし
編集の要約なし |
編集の要約なし |
||
| 7行目: | 7行目: | ||
On the other hand, there is a simpler one: 2x2x2 cube called "Pocket Cube." In fact, this cube is not a child of the Rubik's Cube. It was created by an American chemist named Larry D. Nichols, before Rubik Ernő developed the Rubik's Cube. | On the other hand, there is a simpler one: 2x2x2 cube called "Pocket Cube." In fact, this cube is not a child of the Rubik's Cube. It was created by an American chemist named Larry D. Nichols, before Rubik Ernő developed the Rubik's Cube. | ||
Some types of Rubik's Cubes are no longer "cubes" | Some types of Rubik's Cubes are no longer "cubes." For example, this is a tetrahedron-shaped Rubik's Cube called "Pyraminx," created by a German designer named Uwe Mèffert. There are a variety of other geometric shapes, such as "Decamynx" in the form of a dodecahedron, "Dogic" in the form of an icosahedron, and even "Rubik's Sphere" in the form of the very sphere. | ||
Other Rubik's | Other types of Rubik's Cubes are also no longer "cubes," in terms of dimension. Those cubes exist in virtual space, not in reality. This is because they are not three-dimensional objects. Please look at this 4D Rubik's Cube. Too strange! I have no idea how to handle this, much less how to solve this. There are also a 5D cube, then 6D, 7D... However, the most interesting one among the non-three-dimensional Rubik's Cubes is, I think, this two-dimensional "Rubik's Square." | ||
Like this, there are many Rubik's Cubes that have interesting shapes. Looking at | Like this, there are many Rubik's Cubes that have interesting shapes. Looking at the 3x3 cube now, doesn't it look so easy? If you think so, why not challenge a Rubik's Cube? Thank you for listening. | ||